ANTH 310:
Introduction to Cultural Anthropology Instructor: Jim Snoke
Spring Semester, 2007
Course Outline Series:
Chapters 1 and 2, Week 1
Text: Cultural
Anthropology – Marvin Harris and Orna Johnson
Terminology: Each of
you has been exposed to one or more of these – particularly if you have
received a portion of your education in the
Chapter 1:
1. Anthropological
Perspective
2. Contemporary and
Ancient Peoples
3. Typically
non-western and non-eastern cultures but many Anthropologists study them
exclusively.
4. Sub-Fields:
a. Cultural
Anthropology
b.
Archaeology
c. Anthropological
Linguistics
d. Physical
Anthropology
e. Applied
Anthropology
5. Distinctiveness
about Cultural Anthropology
a. Holism
b.
Fieldwork and Participant Observation
c.
Ethnography
d.
Ethnology
e.
Anthropology and Science
6. Terms, Concepts,
and Practices
a. informant, participant, or respondent
b. Specialized research areas: Ecological Anthropology, Economic
Anthropology, Political Anthropology, Medical Anthropology, Psychological
Anthropology.
c. humanistic
d. scientific
e. hypothesis
Chapter 2:
This chapter gives terms and concepts that are usually
somewhat familiar to students, but the specific way in which Anthropology
defines them may not be as familiar.
Harris presents his “universal pattern”:
Infrastructure, Structure, and Superstructure in an attempt to introduce
students to the notion that there can be a “science of culture”. Etic and Emic concepts are presented as well,
along with mental and behavioral concepts.
Harris also presents material from the history of
interpretive thought – “schools of thought” that have attempted to understand
and explain human behavior through time.
A. Alternative theoretical positions:
1. Sociobiology and Biological Reductionism
2. Dialectical Materialism
3. Structuralism
4. Structural Marxism
5. Psychological and Cognitive Idealism
6. Eclecticism
7. Obscurantism
8 Cultural Materialism
B. For example:
Structuralism
1. Anti-Positivist (anti-scientific)
2. Idealist
3. Dialectical
4. Ahistorical
C. The problem with the 7 positions above is
that while they can be used to explain similarities among human societies, they
cannot explain the differences. Also,
the “cause and effect” arrows invariably point in the wrong direction, or are
completely backwards. This is the result
of a pre-conceived, idealist strategy.